June 2010 LSAT
Section 4
Question 23
A species in which mutations frequently occur will develop new evolutionary adaptations in each generation. Since spe...
Replies
Mehran on March 27, 2016
@MARIO no (A) is a valid argument. The argument would be diagrammed as follows:P: "In a stone wall that is properly built, every stone supports another stone."
PB ==> ESSAS
not ESSAS ==> not PB
P: "Since a wall's being sturdy depends upon its being properly built..."
S ==> PB
not PB ==> not S
C: "...only walls that are composed entirely of stones supporting other stones are sturdy."
S ==> ESSAS
not ESSAS ==> not S
This is a proper transitive inference, i.e. S ==> PB ==> ESSAS.
Hope that helps! Please let us know if you have any other questions.
anadeem321@hotmail.com on October 24, 2022
I do not understand...In P: "In a stone wall that is properly built, every stone supports another stone."
"every" is a sufficient indicator
therefore for the premise it will be diagrammed as follow:
ESSAS ==>PB
not PB==> not ESSAS
afterwards
P: "Since a wall's being sturdy depends upon its being properly built..."
S ==> PB
not PB ==> not S
C: "...only walls that are composed entirely of stones supporting other stones are sturdy."
S ==> ESSAS
not ESSAS ==> not S
This is a NOT proper transitive inference since both premises has the necessary conditions in common just like answer choice A
anadeem321@hotmail.com on October 24, 2022
Just like stimulus***Emil-Kunkin on October 26, 2022
Hi,I think you may have the opening statement reversed. The sentence is saying that if a stone wall is built properly, then every stone supports another. This would be If PB -> Essa