on March 26, 2016
I sorry but I am a little bit confused about the logic here and still cannot get the point why E is right.
As the stem says, that the typewriter would jam results in the limit and the design of QWERTY, but is it reasonable to conclude that if there were no jamming, such as typing by computers, then there would not be any limit? Because maybe it is kind of similar to the situation that "if A then B" but we cannot conclude that "if not A then not B".
Hope you can clarify the logic here. Thank you so much!
Already have an account?
on March 27, 2016