February 1992 LSAT - Section 1 - Question 20
Naz January 15, 2014
Let's first analyze how Lee objects to Pamela. Pamela's argument is as follows: Businesses should adopt policies that facilitate parenting because those children will be the customers, employees, and managers of the future. Lee objects to Pamela by explaining: no single company, however, is patronized, staffed, and managed only by its own employees' children. So, if other companies are not enabling employees to care for children, it would not be to the advantage of an individual company to provide such benefits.Batman January 19, 2014
Thank you so much ^^zacharylouiskane@gmail.com June 1, 2020
For answer B I also made the quick inference that the first passage was talking about society as a whole and that they should do and the objection states that its an individual bases for something just like we saw in the stimulus